China’s households consume only 40% of the country’s GDP, a number that tells a story about anxiety, ambition, and opportunity that reaches far beyond China’s borders. This ratio isn’t just economic accounting; it’s a window into how families make decisions about their futures, and why those decisions are about to reshape global education markets.

Chinese households spend a smaller share of their national income than families in almost any other country. At 39.6% of GDP in 2023, China’s household consumption lags dramatically behind the United States (67.9%), Japan (55.5%), and even the European Union average (51.8%).

But this aggregate masks important nuance. Some economists argue that including social transfers in kind, government-provided services like subsidized healthcare and education, raises China’s effective consumption to around 46% of GDP by 2019. Even with this adjustment, the gap remains substantial. More importantly, it shows why households save so aggressively: they’re self-insuring against uncertainty.

The numbers are striking when viewed against peers. Household deposits increased by 15 and 18 trillion RMB (equal to 11.6% and 13.3% of GDP) in 2023 and 2024. Another 10 trillion RMB was added in the first half of 2025. This isn’t a cultural preference for saving. It’s a rational response to structural exposure.

A December 2025 IMF working paper confirms that China’s household savings are “markedly higher” than those of peer countries. Lower social spending in rural areas and hukou-related constraints force families to bear the costs of healthcare, eldercare, housing volatility, and educational competition themselves.

Europe offers a useful counterpoint. The eurozone savings rate reached 15.3% in Q3 2024, still above pre-pandemic levels, dampening consumption despite low unemployment. Different institutions, same dynamic: when households feel exposed, they save more and spend less.

‍

Why Services Are the Key, and Why Education Follows

The path to higher household consumption, and to transforming global education, runs through one sector: services. Specifically, the services that replace household anxiety with household confidence, healthcare, childcare, eldercare, housing stability, and education support shape how and where families invest in their future.

China’s government understands this. The 2025 “Special Action Plan to Boost Consumption” focuses on boosting wage income through measures that benefit lower-income workers, including support for small and medium-sized enterprises, vocational training, strengthened unemployment insurance, and minimum wage increases.

Services already account for 46.1% of per-capita household consumption in 2024, up 7.4% year over year. Even with total consumption share stuck below 40% of GDP, what households buy is shifting toward services, the spending that improves life, not just fills it.

The consumption rebalancing challenge is significant. China had investment representing 42% of GDP in 2023; the global average is 24%. China’s consumption represented 56% (versus a global average of 76%). These imbalances are so extreme that even a ten-percentage-point shift toward consumption would still leave China with among the highest investment shares globally.

The Rhodium Group projects that, without significant fiscal reforms, long-term household consumption growth will likely slow to around 3-4% per year in real terms over the next five to ten years. If this projection holds, it sets an effective ceiling on GDP growth. China would need to dramatically increase productivity or expand its trade surplus to counter this—both face structural headwinds.

‍

The Mobility Multiplier: Why Consumption Becomes Education

Here’s where the main argument comes into focus: the link between macroeconomic change and family strategy is direct. As household consumption increases, spending on education compounds, reshaping both domestic and international markets.

Household consumption capacity is a “mobility multiplier.” When families can spend, they invest in activities that compound: tutoring, language training, extracurriculars, counseling—the inputs that expand future options.

China’s 2024 consumption data shows nationwide per-capita consumption was 28,227 yuan, with education, culture, and recreation taking 3,189 yuan, 11.3% of the total, up 9.8% year over year. Education-adjacent spending is already one of the fastest-growing slices of household budgets, even before any major consumption rebalancing arrives.

Compare this to the EU, where education accounts for just 0.9% of household expenditure (0.5% of GDP). This isn’t because Europeans value education less. Education is largely public, so households spend on housing, transport, and lifestyle instead. The costs are socialized, so the category looks small even as outcomes remain strong.

‍

The South Korean Warning: When Education Spending Becomes Unsustainable

South Korea offers a cautionary tale about what happens when household education spending becomes an arms race. Spending on private education surged by more than 60% over the past decade, reaching nearly 29.2 trillion won ($20.2 billion) in 2024. This represents a fourth consecutive annual rise.

The scale is remarkable. South Koreans spent 27.1 trillion won on private education in 2023, with each student averaging 553,000 won per month and high school students spending 740,000 won per month. For context, private education now consumes a record 13.5% of monthly household expenditures.

South Korea’s economic success has led to significant social problems, including high rates of suicide, high household debt, and low fertility, with one main cause being the dramatic increase in education expenditures, especially on private after-school tutoring programs.

The mechanism is clear: excess demand for elite institutions creates an education arms race. Families overinvest, not because returns increased, but because competition intensified. Experts link the relentless growth to frequent changes in college admissions policies, which create uncertainty and push parents toward private tutoring.

China is not South Korea, yet. But the structural similarities are worth noting. Both economies grew rapidly through export-led development and high investment. Both have competitive education systems with limited seats at elite universities. Both have households that view education as the primary vehicle for social mobility.

China is not South Korea, yet. But the similarities are worth noting. Both grew rapidly through export-led development and high investment, and both have competitive education systems with limited elite university seats. In both cases, households view education as the main path to social mobility. The difference: China is catching this dynamic earlier, with household consumption still constrained. If Chinese household consumption rises, education spending will rise too. Whether this is virtuous (genuine skill development) or vicious (zero-sum competition) depends critically on supply-side reforms in higher education.

‍

Vietnam’s Emerging Pattern: The Next Wave

Vietnam provides a real-time example of how rising middle-class consumption translates to education demand.

Vietnam’s middle class is expanding rapidly. It is expected to reach 26% of the population by 2026, up from just 13% in 2023. This is an increase of over 25 million consumers with rising disposable incomes. Steady income gains drive greater spending on education, healthcare, and entertainment.

Healthcare, education, and housing emerge as primary beneficiaries of enhanced purchasing power, with spending patterns indicating sustained consumer confidence and willingness to invest in quality-of-life improvements.

The education infrastructure is responding. Vietnam’s higher education market is forecast to grow by $616.5 million between 2024 and 2029, while online education is projected to reach $627.4 million by 2029, driven by widespread digital adoption and private sector growth.

In March 2025, the Asian Development Bank announced its first private sector investment in Vietnam’s education sector, leading a $150 million sustainability-linked loan to Vinschool to support facilities for 20,400 students in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Hung Yen.

Vietnam’s trajectory, from 13% middle class to 26% in three years, offers a compressed preview of what could happen in China if household consumption accelerates. The demand doesn't just lift domestic providers. It globalizes quickly as families seek international credentials and diversified pathways.

‍

The Scale That Changes Everything

The core implication of this analysis is clear: China’s vast economic size means even small increases in household consumption can have seismic effects on global education demand and opportunity.

China’s 2024 nominal GDP reached 134.8 trillion yuan. If household consumption moves from 40% to 50% of GDP, a plausible medium-term shift, that’s roughly 13.5 trillion yuan in new household spending power.

With education, culture, and recreation accounting for 11.3% of consumption, even a small share of this shift could generate trillions of yuan in new demand for education-related categories. Healthcare, travel, housing, and child services would also see growth.

This isn’t a vanity metric. It’s the size of the channel through which families buy opportunity.

For context, Australia’s international education sector, often cited as a major export success, generated $51.5 billion in 2024. A ten-percentage-point shift in China’s household consumption would create a pool of resources for education spending roughly 26 times larger than Australia’s entire international education export industry.

‍

When Chinese Households Spend More on Education, Demand Globalizes

Rising Chinese household consumption doesn’t just lift domestic tutoring. It globalizes demand.

Families diversify. They buy international credentials earlier, choose English-taught modules and summer programs, consider studying abroad, and build optionality through hybrid pathways.

‍

The European Opportunity: Already Inside the Flow

Europe is already inside this flow. In 2023, 1.76 million international students studied in the EU, 8.4% of all tertiary students. China (including Hong Kong) was the single largest source country, accounting for 5.6% of total EU tertiary enrollment.

Germany provides a striking example of rapid international student growth. In the 2024/25 winter semester, just over 402,000 foreign students were enrolled in German higher education, a 6% increase from 2023/24, with 116,600 new students, a record high number of commencements.

The composition is shifting. India now leads with 49,008 students, surpassing China’s 38,687, marking a 262% increase in Indian students over eight years. But Chinese enrollment remains substantial and concentrated in high-value fields. Engineering has the most international students in Germany, with 145,707, followed by Law, Economics, and Social Sciences with 87,350.

India surpasses China with 59,000 students, up 20% year-over-year, compared to China's 38,600, while Asia-Pacific accounts for 33% of all international enrollments for Germany.

Germany’s appeal is structural: tuition-free or low-cost education, affordable living costs, strong engineering and technical programs, and post-graduation work opportunities. These factors align precisely with Chinese household priorities, high return on investment, technical skill development, and career pathways.

France is also seeing growth. France recorded a 17% increase in international enrollments in 2024/25 and aims to attract half a million foreign students by 2027.

‍

The UK’s China Dependence—and Vulnerability

The United Kingdom presents a more complex picture. The number of new international students accepted for undergraduate studies at UK universities dropped by 17% from 2020 to 2024, while new Chinese undergraduates accepted to UK universities climbed significantly over the past decade.

Limited growth potential among the top ten source markets, coupled with declines across previously growing sources, has made UK universities more dependent on their largest new undergrad population: students from China.

This concentration creates vulnerability. Of the 162 student populations that saw at least 10 students accepted for undergrad programs at UK universities in 2024, 108 (67%) experienced no growth or negative growth compared to 2023.

The UK’s dependence on Chinese students is both an opportunity and a risk. If Chinese household consumption rises and education spending with it, UK institutions stand to benefit significantly. But if geopolitical tensions disrupt flows, or if Chinese families diversify away from concentrated UK enrollment toward a broader set of European and Asian destinations, UK universities face revenue pressure.

Chinese students are diversifying their study abroad options, with less than a third applying to institutions in one country for the 2024 academic year, compared to 37% applying to two and 24% applying to three. European countries such as Germany, Spain, the Netherlands, and Ireland are becoming hot spots for Chinese students.

This diversification is rational risk management. Families are building portfolios of options rather than single-destination bets.

‍

Why the EU and Online Providers Are Positioned to Capture the Next Wave

The next surge in Chinese education spending won’t all flow into traditional four-year degrees.

A significant share will go to what we might call “stackable advantage”, micro-credentials, university-recognized modules, English-taught certificates, academic writing preparation, admissions readiness, and dual-diploma pathways. These products scale faster than physical seats.

The EU is building infrastructure for exactly this. In June 2022, the European Council adopted a Recommendation on a European approach to micro-credentials, designed to support the development and recognition of micro-credentials across institutions and borders. This policy framework aligns perfectly with Chinese family demand for flexible, portable credentials that keep options open.

‍

The Digital Delivery Advantage

Online education providers worldwide are positioned to capture a strong tailwind. Market estimates suggest the digital education sector will grow from roughly $24 billion in 2025 to around $80 billion by 2030, driven by AI-enhanced delivery and scalable models.

Coursera had 3.3 million learners from China in 2021, with 97 million learners globally, 6,003 courses, 910 micro-credentials, and 34 degrees. These platforms offer precisely what rising Chinese middle-class families need: credentialed learning from recognized institutions, delivered flexibly at prices far below those of traditional study-abroad programs.

The pandemic proved the viability of remote credentialing. Chinese universities joined global platforms. Dozens of online courses offered by Chinese universities joined global online education platforms like edX and Coursera, with the Ministry of Education planning to host a world MOOC conference and proposing the establishment of the World MOOC Alliance.

This creates a two-way channel: Chinese institutions export credentialing globally, while global institutions reach Chinese households digitally. The result is a more liquid, competitive global market for educational credentials.

‍

The Geopolitical Diversification Driver

There’s a second, underappreciated factor accelerating European and digital credential demand: geopolitics.

The U.S. has begun “aggressively” revoking visas for some Chinese students in “critical fields.” When access to one major destination becomes unpredictable, families diversify to other countries and to portable credentials that keep options open.

This isn’t speculation. Chinese outbound student demand is rising again in 2024, prompted in part by China’s troubled economy: exports are down, youth unemployment is high, and real estate values are plummeting, causing cash flow crises for many households.

Economic pressure at home, combined with visa uncertainty in traditional destinations, creates strong incentives to pursue multiple pathways: one child might pursue a German engineering degree (low cost, high ROI), accumulate micro-credentials from UK and US institutions online, and maintain optionality for graduate study across multiple regions.

Europe, with its multi-country ecosystem, growing micro-credential infrastructure, and generally more predictable visa environment, becomes a natural diversification choice.

Germany is enrolling more foreign students than ever, more than 400,000 in 2024/25, and has launched several policies to help retain them; Spain’s international enrollment is up 77% over the past decade and approved fast-track university access for students rejected under Trump policies.

‍

The Australian Benchmark: What Real Impact Looks Like

Want a concrete example of how international education spending translates to economic impact?

Australia’s international education sector generated $51.5 billion in 2024, of which $29.6 billion was from goods and services and $21.7 billion from tuition fees. The numbers are Australia-specific, but the logic generalizes: when households in large origin countries can spend more on education, destination countries see effects in GDP, services exports, jobs, housing, travel, and entire local ecosystems.

Australia enrolled 821,555 international students in 2024, a 9% increase over 2023, though applications have since decreased due to restrictive government policies, high rejection rates, and visa fee hikes.

Australia’s experience illustrates both the opportunity and the policy challenge. International education can become a major economic sector, Australia’s third-largest export—but rapid growth can trigger political backlash over housing pressure, service strain, and labor-market effects.

Europe doesn’t need to replicate Australia’s concentrated model. But it can learn from the same macro logic: educational services are high-value exports, student flows create network effects, and early investment in international student infrastructure compounds over time.

‍

Regional Variations Within Europe: Why One Size Doesn’t Fit All

The EU’s household consumption range is instructive. Greece at 75.3%, Croatia at 70.5%, and Portugal at 66.6% are high-consumption economies in which households spend most of their income. Ireland at 25.9%, Luxembourg at 33.7%, and the Netherlands at 42.5% represent lower consumption shares, often reflecting high savings, significant distortions from foreign investment, or large corporate sectors.

This variation matters for education strategy. Countries with lower household consumption shares (such as Ireland and the Netherlands) may find it easier to accommodate international students in housing and service infrastructure. Countries with higher household consumption shares may face more immediate pressure when student inflows increase housing costs.

Germany, with its balance of strong public services, affordable housing stock, and industrial demand for technical talent, sits in a sweet spot: able to accommodate international students at scale while channeling them into economically productive pathways.

‍

The Second-Order Question: Supply or Demand Constraint?

If Chinese household consumption rises and education spending increases, will the constraint be demand or supply?

For physical international student seats, supply is binding in the short term. Universities can’t double capacity overnight. Visa processing, housing, and faculty hiring all face real constraints.

But for digital credentials, the supply curve is nearly horizontal. The marginal cost of adding students to online programs is minimal. Quality control is the challenge, not capacity.

This creates an interesting bifurcation. Premium physical programs (Oxford, ETH Zurich, Sorbonne) will likely see modest enrollment increases but significant increases in selectivity and potentially pricing power. Mass-market digital credentials will see explosive growth in volume but competitive pressure on pricing.

The strategic opportunity for European institutions is in the middle: hybrid models that combine digital delivery for foundational content with intensive in-person components for specialization, networking, and credentialing. This is where micro-credentials, stackable certificates, and modular degree pathways fit.

‍

The Hidden Conclusion

It’s reasonable to say “subsidizing services is the path to higher household consumption” because service spending is where household confidence gets built.

But the second-order effect is more interesting: once households feel stable enough to spend, education becomes the category that converts spending into mobility. And mobility becomes the mechanism that turns household choices into global flows.

China’s shift from 40% household consumption toward levels typical of mature consumer economies isn’t just GDP rebalancing. It’s a potential rebalancing of who can access high-quality education, who can purchase global readiness early, and which regions become platforms for the next generation of internationally mobile, internationally credentialed talent.

Europe, with its existing international student market, its spectrum of household consumption structures across member states, its push toward micro-credentials, and its relative geopolitical stability, is positioned to capture an outsized opportunity.

The question isn’t whether Chinese household education spending will rise. Given demographic pressures, economic maturation, and competitive dynamics, it will almost certainly. The question is which education providers and which destination countries will build the right infrastructure to capture this flow.

If they build the right bridges.

And build them now.

‍

References

‍

Australian Government Department of Education. (2025, June 11). Education export income — Calendar year. https://www.education.gov.au/international-education-data-and-research/education-export-income-calendar-year

Council of the European Union. (2022, June 16). Council recommends European approach to micro-credentials. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/16/council-recommends-european-approach-to-micro-credentials/

Council of the European Union. (2022, June 27). Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on a European approach to micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability (2022/C 243/02). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj%3AJOC_2022_243_R_0002

Eurostat. (2025, August 22). 8.4% of tertiary students in the EU came from abroad. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250822-1

Eurostat. (2025, November 21). Household consumption by purpose (Statistics Explained). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Household_consumption_by_purpose

Eurostat. (n.d.). Learning mobility statistics (Statistics Explained). Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Learning_mobility_statistics

Eurostat. (n.d.). Tertiary education statistics (Statistics Explained). Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Tertiary_education_statistics

European Commission. (2024, December 19). A European approach to micro-credentials. https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/micro-credentials

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2025, December 23). Shares of gross domestic product: Personal consumption expenditures (DPCERE1Q156NBEA) [Data set]. FRED. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DPCERE1Q156NBEA

International Monetary Fund. (2025, December 11). Reforms to reduce China’s high household savings (IMF Working Paper No. WP/25/259). https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/12/12/reforms-to-reduce-chinas-high-household-savings-572507

MarketsandMarkets. (2025). Digital education market size, share, growth report — 2030. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/digital-education-market-7751828.html

Migration Data Portal. (n.d.). International students — Trends. Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://www.migrationdataportal.org/themes/international-students-trends

Mordor Intelligence. (2025, June 16). Digital education market — Growth, trends, COVID-19 impact, and forecasts (2025–2030). https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/digital-education-market

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2025, January 24). Households’ income and consumption expenditure in 2024. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202501/t20250124_1958443.html

OECD. (2025). China: Overview of the education system (EAG 2025). Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=CHN&topic=EO&treshold=5

OECD Development Centre. (2024). Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2024 (Report). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/05/economic-outlook-for-southeast-asia-china-and-india-2024_dfbc30c0/3bbe7dfe-en.pdf

Reuters. (2025, January 13). Euro zone savings rate dips in Q3 but stays exceptionally high. https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/euro-zone-savings-rate-dips-q3-stays-exceptionally-high-2025-01-13/

Reuters. (2025, March 20). China urged to ramp up support for services consumption. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-urged-ramp-up-support-services-consumption-2025-03-20/

Reuters. (2025, May 29). US says it will start revoking visas for Chinese students. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/rubio-says-us-will-start-revoking-visas-chinese-students-2025-05-28/

Reuters. (2025, December 26). China’s statistics bureau revises down 2024 final GDP. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/chinas-statistics-bureau-revises-down-2024-final-gdp-2025-12-26/

TIME. (2025). World’s top EdTech companies of 2025. Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://time.com/collection/worlds-top-edtech-companies-2025/

TIME. (2025). How TIME and Statista determined the world’s top EdTech companies of 2025 (Methodology). Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://time.com/7280705/worlds-top-edtech-companies-2025-methodology/

World Bank. (n.d.). Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (% of GDP) — China (NE.CON.PRVT.ZS)[Data set]. World Development Indicators. Retrieved December 30, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.CON.PRVT.ZS?locations=CN

‍